Navigation First Circuit Rejects UMass Law Professor's First Amendment Claims Against Union
“Our conclusion that Peltz-Steele is overreading the passages from Janus in question draws further support from another passage in Janus itself that Peltz-Steele ignores. In explaining that the union’s asserted need to charge nonunion employees agency fees to cover the costs of representing such employees in grievance proceedings did not supply a sufficiently compelling state interest to overcome heightened review, the Court noted that unions could instead use a ‘less restrictive’ system in which nonmember employees pay for such services only if they use them—or simply deny representation to nonmembers in grievance proceedings altogether,”
