Featured Videos

The Arizona Court of Appeals, Division One, vacated and remanded the Maricopa County Superior Court’s ruling after finding the parties had explicitly agreed to arbitrate any disputes relating to plaintiff Michele Gray’s employment with her former employer, defendant GC Services.        

Ohio’s Board of Professional Conduct of the Supreme Court found that attorney Mark Bennett’s power was “not inconsequential” despite not being in a position to hire or fire an intern in his office.        

Bradley Arant is “seeing growth in areas where other firms are intentionally restricting that growth in terms of lateral hires,” said Atlanta office managing partner Sidney Welch.        

The Court of Appeals’ ruling is expected to have broad implications not just for New York—one of the hardest hit states during the pandemic—but nationally, since the court’s interpretation of the policy language could impact how other courts rule on pandemic-related business interruption disputes.        

“I expect that they will be looking for opportunities to apply all of the elements of the guidelines in merger cases — to some extent, they’ve already been doing that,” said former FTC Chair William Kovacic.        

Missed out on some of the year’s important stories or want to read them again? Here are the most-read LTN articles from 2023.        

Significant questions remain about the legal implications of generative AI and its future in the market.        

Looking back at legal education litigation news and scandals from 2023.        

The trustee of the bankruptcy estate of fired Major Lindsey recruiter Sharon Mahn alleged inappropriate conduct by the recruiting firm’s counsel in a recent filing in New York state court.        

“Your actions set the standard.”