Featured Videos

The move to the federal appeals court comes after U.S. District Chief Judge David C. Nye of the District of Idaho denied the plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction last week because they did not demonstrate having a protectable liberty interest in the nondisclosure of their gender identity.        

This article explores developments (both positive and negative) in the post-TMA world in which courts have wrestled with implementation of the presumption of irreparable harm in trademark cases.        

“We have not evaluated the parameters of how to prove recovery in disability cases through published opinions or otherwise,” stated Justice Lynne J. Boomgaarden. “However, other states have, and we found some applicable legal commentary and secondary authority, which illustrate the factors courts consider to prove recovery and the type of evidence an attorney might […]

Clay Thompson plans to ask a bankruptcy judge on Thursday to lift the automatic stay in Bestwall’s Chapter 11 case so that his client can have a trial against Georgia-Pacific.        

The Legal Speak podcast interviewed attendees of Law.com and Corporate Counsel’s Women, Influence & Power in Law (WIPL) in New Orleans about how the industry can support the growth and development of women.        

“The constitutionality of reverse-keyword warrants presents an issue of first impression in Colorado. Indeed, to our knowledge, no state supreme court or federal appellate court has addressed the constitutionality of such warrants,” stated Justice William W. Hood, III. “Nor have we previously determined whether individuals have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their internet search […]

The circuit court affirmed a district court’s dismissal of fee and unjust enrichment claims after hearing oral arguments in the case last month.        

The recent turnover in Am Law 200 leadership has multiple drivers, some say, including burnout in the wake of the pandemic, political upheaval and a massive shift to remote work.        

“The foreperson and several other jurors told us that they had been ten seconds away from submitting the verdict that they had already agreed upon,” said Jeb Butler of Butler Khan. “The verdict was for the [plaintiff’s] family in the amount of $23 million, with 75% of the fault placed on [the defendant] and 25% […]

“At some point, it became not just a matter of reversible error. It called into question the fundamental fairness and integrity of the Delaware civil justice system,” Viet Dinh said during an appearance at Harvard Monday.